Skip to main content

Microsoft remotely deleted Tor-based 'Sefnit Botnet' from more than 2 Million Systems

In October 2013, Microsoft adopted a silent, offensive method to tackle infection due to a Tor-based botnet malware called 'Sefnit'.

In an effort to takedown of the Sefnit botnet to protect windows users, Microsoft remotely removes the older versions of installed Tor Browser software and infection from 2 Million systems, even without the knowledge of the system's owner.


Last year in August, after Snowden revelations about the National Security Agency's (NSA) Spying programs, the Internet users were under fear of being spied. During the same time Tor Project leaders noticed almost 600% increase in the number of users over the anonymizing networks of Tor i.e. More than 600,000 users join Tor within few weeks.

In September, researchers identified the major reason of increased Tor users i.e. A Tor-based botnet called 'Sefnit malware', which was infecting millions of computers for click fraud and bitcoin mining.

To achieve the maximum number of infections, cyber criminals were using several ways to spread their botnet. On later investigation, Microsoft discovered some popular softwares like Browser Protector andFileScout, bundled with vulnerable version of Tor Browser & Sefnit components.
'The security problem lies in the fact that during a Sefnit component infection, the Tor client service is also silently installed in the background. Even after Sefnit is removed, unless specific care is taken, the Tor service will be left and still regularly connect to the Tor Network.'
Microsoft remotely uninstalled Tor software from computers to halt botnet
It was not practically possible for Microsoft or the Government to instruct each individual on 'How to remove this Malware', so finally Microsoft took the decision of remotely washing out the infections themselves. 

To clean infected machines, Microsoft began updating definitions for its antimalware apps.
"We modified our signatures to remove the Sefnit-added Tor client service. Signature and remediation are included in all Microsoft security software, including Microsoft Security Essentials, Windows Defender on Windows 8, Microsoft Safety Scanner, Microsoft System Center Endpoint Protection, and Windows Defender Offline." and later also in Malicious Software Removal Tool.
But why Tor Browser?
"Even after Sefnit is removed, unless specific care is taken, the Tor service will be left and still regularly connect to the Tor Network. This is a problem not only for the workload it applies to the Tor Network, but also for the security of these computers." Microsoft says.
So they removed it and to Justify their action, Microsoft points out several vulnerabilities in the Tor version bundled with Sefnit malware i.e. Tor version 0.2.3.25, that opens the user to attack through these known vulnerabilities.
"Tor is a good application used to anonymous traffic and usually poses no threat. Unfortunately, the version installed by Sefnit is v0.2.3.25 – and does not self-update. The latest Tor release builds at the time of writing is v0.2.4.20."
Tor Browser
May be this is the right way to neutralize the infections, but the Microsoft's action also clarifies the capability to remotely remove any software from your computer.

Nicholas J. Hopper from University of Minnesota, provided a detailed explanation about 'Protecting Tor from botnet abuse in the long term' in a paper.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Facebook Web Security Bug Bounty: Directory Traversal Vulnerability / RCE In Parse.com

http://parse.com   directory traversal vulnerability Little Insight: http://parse.com  was vulnerable to a directory traversal / RCE vulnerability. As a result, it was possible for an attacker to load web server-readable files from the local filesystem. or Run commend on That Well this is my 4th reward form facebook  Directory Traversal or RCE Vulnerability  That  give me 5th position in Facebook white-hat Page Report Date :23  July 2014 Reward For Directory Traversal or RCE Vulnerability :  20000$ How This work......? As we discussed earlier on my old post  Flowdock Directory Traversal Vulnerability exposed files outside of Rails’ view paths. '%5C' turns into '\' after decoding. Using Rack::Protection    it only rejects '/../' segments in the request path.   patch apply for Rack::Protection acording CVE-2014-0130  and  also Reject now '%5C' turns into '\' af...

HC WeB : A Browser for HACKERS...

A Browser for HACKERS... Try for Free... Download HC WeB Setup Gallery: Online Penetration Testing Tools Index Information Gathering Whois DNS Location Info Enumeration and Fingerprint Data Mining Search Engines Editors Online Text Editors Share Text Snippets Network Utilities Ping HTTP HTTPS VNC Remote Desktop SSH DNS Sniffers Misc Forensics Frameworks URL Cloaking E-mail Password Cracking Encoders and Decoders Encoders Decoders Malwares Malware Analysis Identify Malicious Websites Suspected Malicious IPs and URLs Application Auditing SQL Injection Cross Site Scripting File Inclusion Anonymity Proxy Others Hackery Open Penetration Testing Bookmarks Collection Hacker Media Blogs, Forums, Magazines and Videos. Methodologies Penetration testing frameworks, standards and methodologies. OSINT Presentations, People, Organizations and Infrastructure.  Exploits an...

Confirmed: Angry Birds website hacked by Anti-NSA Hacker

Syrian Electronic Army yesterday posted a tweet saying that one of its friend with handle "Anti-NSA" hacker defaced the Angry website. At the time, we were not able to confirm the defacement.  No one was reported to have seen the hack.  Even the Zone-h mirror didn't confirm the defacement, displayed a message "The mirror is onhold and has not been verified yet". So, we didn't have strong proof to report the hack.  Today,  Rovio, creator of angry birds, confirmed that the defacement was there for few minutes and corrected immediately.  Now, the Zone-h record also confirmed it. Antti Tikkanen, Director of Security Response at F-Secure Labs, said in twitter that the attack is actually 'DNS Hijack attack'. He mentioned that the website itself not touched by the hacker; hacker managed to modify the DNS records. He also said that the angrybirds website pointed to some IP address(31.170.165.141) assoicated with Lithuania for at least one hour.  The same ...